Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks
February 7, 2025
Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]
The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat WhistleblowersWhat is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]
Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen MonksHow Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]
Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic StrategiesGeopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]
Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional FranchisesIn the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]
The previous articles touched upon the role of hierarchy in decision making. In this article, we consider whether top down decision or bottom up decision making is effective.
To consider this comparison it would be useful to think of top down decision making as being akin to someone sitting on top of a tree telling those at the bottom about how best to take care of the garden on the ground. On the other hand, bottom up decision making is akin to those at the bottom deciding on how best to tend the garden and ensuring that the other trees grow to the same height as well.
It does not take a genius to figure out that those at the bottom have a better understanding of the ground realities than those at the top.
The point here is that top down decision making is becoming redundant in these days when autonomy and decentralization are the norm.
Having said that, it is important to realize that not all decisions can be made by those at the middle or lower levels of the corporate hierarchy; Indeed, it is the case that most decision making pertaining to organizational policies, firm wise strategy and customer acquisition and customer relationship management has to be done from the top since the view from the top is unhindered as well as the top management having the experience and the foresight to take such decisions.
The point that needs to be noted is that bottom up decision making works well when the day to day running of the teams and divisions are concerned. It does not work well in cases of strategic acquisitions and firm wide policy making that is best left to the top management.
Of course, which is better also depends on the type of organization since those in the services sector operate in more democratic ways as compared to the firms in the manufacturing sector. This is because of the very nature of the work which is different in these two cases.
Since manufacturing is all about set routines and machines, the instructions have to be sent from the top since the decision making as well as the implementation operates in linear ways.
However, the services sector is driven by complexity and non-linearity and hence, decision making has to be done according to the needs of the situation and the players involved in the decision making process have to act in ways that maximize their benefits from the decision.
Finally, this is the bottom line requirement for any decision making process i.e. how much benefit that the decision brings to the firm as opposed to the costs incurred in such decision making. If the benefits far outweigh the costs, then decisions can be done in top down or bottom up manner with outcomes that are favourable to the whole organization.
There are many instances of decisions taken at the top that were not actualized and implemented properly because of incoherent communication and inconsistent transmission. On the other hand, there are many decisions that have been taken by the middle and lower levels that lack the experience and foresight not to mention the strategic depth which have resulted in short term thinking.
In conclusion, top down or bottom up decision making is effective according to the needs of the situation and is determined by several factors which we would examine one by one in the succeeding articles.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *