Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks
February 7, 2025
Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]
What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]
How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]
Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]
In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]
It is common for insurance companies to not hold the entire risk that they underwrite on their own portfolios. Instead, insurance companies try to find ways and means to offload some of this risk to other entities. This is common with all types of insurance. However, it becomes more pronounced with catastrophe-related insurance. This is because of the fact that catastrophe insurance is generally related to huge losses which can cause significant damage to the balance sheet of the insurance company.
Reinsurance is one of the most obvious ways in which organizations offload some of their risks to other entities. However, it is not the only way.
Securitization of insurance risks has also been used by insurance companies in the past. In this article, we will understand what is the securitization of insurance risks and how it can be used as an alternative to reinsurance.
Securitization works in a manner that is very similar to traditional reinsurance. However, the advantage is that regular investors can purchase catastrophe bonds. There is no requirement for having a license to issue a reinsurance policy in order to underwrite this risk.
If an insurance company wants to use securitization to transfer risks worth $1 million, then they will simply issue $1 million worth of cat bonds. This means that they collect $1 million from the investors. Now, if the catastrophe does occur, then the $1 million principal payment will be forfeited and only the coupon payment will be made to the investors. The forfeited principle will be used to make good for the loss of the insurance company in the event of a catastrophe.
However, if the catastrophe does not occur, then the payment of the principal as well as the agreed-upon coupon rate will be legally binding on the issuing insurance company. Hence, in effect, the insurance company is obtaining a reinsurance cover from multiple small investors in the open market instead of approaching a single insurance company.
The recent past has seen a rapid increase in the popularity of securitization as an alternative mechanism to obtaining reinsurance. This is because of the fact that securitization has several advantages. Some of the main factors responsible for this increase in the quantum of securitization have been mentioned below:
Securitization does not have to be done by a reinsurance company. The insurance company can approach investors on the open market in order to offload some of their risks. This helps in the creation of additional reinsurance capacity when required and this capacity can be extinguished when it is not required.
Although, the regulations regarding the issuance of bonds differ from country to country, in most parts of the world these regulations are considered to be quite lenient when compared with the regulations for insurance and reinsurance companies. This means that insurance companies have to face fewer costs and hassles related to regulatory issues when they issue securities as compared to when they opt for a reinsurance cover.
Securities can be purchased by eligible investors all over the world. Hence, the pool of capital which can be used to support a viable securitization issue is much higher as compared to the pool which is used for reinsurance. The availability of more risk capital makes it cheaper for insurance companies to issue securities in most cases.
Also, the premium related to risk management is paid out in the form of a coupon payment. This generally means that the payment is made at the end of the tenure. Hence, the insurance company has a delayed cash flow schedule and can use the cash to manage its other liabilities in the meanwhile.
If managed efficiently, this cash flow timing advantage can be significant and can translate into cost benefits for the insurance company.
The bottom line is that securitization is a viable alternative to reinsurance in some cases. However, more information needs to be collected and analyzed before making any decision.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *