Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

In the previous article, we understood what reinsurance is. We also studied the various types of reinsurance contracts that are commonly signed by insurance companies.

The problem is that many a times people get confused between reinsurance and double insurance, since there are more than one insurance companies involved in both the cases.

However, it needs to be understood that reinsurance and double insurance are both very different.

In this article, we will have a closer look at the differences between the two concepts.

  • Definition: Reinsurance is a contract between an insurance company and another insurance company. This is done to insure that all the risk is not concentrated in the hands of a single insurance company.

    On the other hand double insurance is a situation when the policyholder gets the same risk and subject matter covered by more than one insurance companies.

    The sum total of all the policies must be greater than the value of the underlying property in case of double insurance.

    For instance, if the value of a car is $1000, two insurance policies worth $500 and $400 will not be termed as double insurance. This is because, the sum assured is lower than the value of the property. On the other hand, if the sum assured for two policies is $800 and $700, then the total sum assured is $1500 as opposed to the underlying value of $1000. Since the sum assured exceeds the value of the property, such an arrangement will be called double insurance.

    It needs to be understood that in the case of reinsurance, the insurance company is covered against the possibility of a loss. On the other hand, in case of double insurance, the policyholder is covered against the possibility of loss.

  • Principle of Indemnity: The principle of indemnity states that a person should not be able to make a profit from insurance. Insurance is only to recover the loss and not to make a profit. Otherwise people will start damaging their own possessions in order to profit from it.

    Reinsurance is in line with the principle of indemnity whereas on the other hand, double insurance is against the principle of indemnity.

    This is because in case of reinsurance, the same risk is covered by the reinsurer.

    For instance, if an insurance company has sold $1000 worth insurance on a car, it is again reinsuring the same risk with another insurance company. Hence, in the event of a loss, the insured will receive only $100 which will cover the loss and not allow the customer to make a profit.

    In case of double insurance, a person has insured the same $1000 vehicle with two insurance companies. Hence, in the event of a loss, the total pay-out should be restricted to $1000 only. The person cannot claim $1000 from two parties and benefit from the insurance claim. In case of double insurance, two insurance companies will have to deal with each other and make a combined payment to the policyholder.

  • Dependency: In case of reinsurance, the second contract is contingent on the existence of the first contract. This means that reinsurance cannot be claimed if the original insurance contract is not in effect! This ensures that the insurance company cannot profit from a claim made on the behalf of others.

    In case of double insurance, two or more insurance contracts are independent of one another. Hence, even if the user decides to cancel one of the insurance contracts, such an action will have no effect on the other contract. The policyholder can still continue to claim on one of the policy if the other one doesn’t exist.

  • Life Insurance: Since no one can place a value on human life, the concept of double insurance doesn’t really apply to life insurance.

    Hence, policyholders are allowed to take as many insurance contracts as companies are willing to sell them. In the event of their death, all companies will have to pay up the entire sum assured. There will be no splitting of sum assured in this case, since the principle of indemnity doesn’t apply.

  • Purpose: Reinsurance serves the purpose of diversifying risk. It is a tool used by large insurance companies to park a certain part of their risk with insurance companies in other nations. On the other hand, double insurance is not a mechanism to diversify risk.

    In many cases, it is an attempt to defraud the insurance company and profit from claims. In order to prevent fraudulent claims, insurance companies have to constantly share data with each other regarding the underlying asset and the sum assured that has been granted against it.

The bottom line is that reinsurance and double insurance are very different from each other. The only similarity they have is that more than one insurance company is involved in both the cases.

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

Admin

Personal Grooming Tips for Women

Admin

Politics in Virtual Workplace

Admin