Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

In order to be successful at investing, an investor not only needs to have mastery over their numbers, but they also need to have mastery over their emotions as well. In the past few articles, we have already discussed how emotional biases can lead to suboptimal performance in investing. In this article, we will try to understand the “regret aversion bias,” which is another important bias that obscures the thinking of the investors and gets them to make wrong decisions.

The details of regret aversion bias have been listed further in this article.

What is Regret Aversion?

An investor is said to be suffering from regret aversion bias when he/she refuses to make any decision because of the fear that the decision will turn out to be wrong and then may later lead to feelings of regret. The emotional process behind this pretty simple. Regret causes emotional pain. Hence, the brain tries to avoid making decisions that cause regret.

It is important to understand that investors can make two different types of errors. On the one hand, they can make a decision which turns out to be wrong. This can be called an error of commission because some action has been committed by the investor. On the other hand, an investor can simply miss out on a great opportunity by not taking any decision. This can be called an error of omission because of the lack of any action from the investor.

In financial terms, an investor may be likely to lose the same amount of money either by commission or by omission. However, when it comes to psychological terms, the commission error has a much higher chance of inducing regret. This is because regret is usually associated with a responsibility for an action taken. This is the reason that in case of regret aversion, no action becomes the default response of the buyer.

Can Regret Aversion be Positive?

Regret aversion need not always be negative. In some cases, these biases may help investors from making wrong decisions. For example, if a buyer has already lost money by investing in an overheated market, the regret aversion will prevent them from investing in peaking markets the next time. This might actually help them avoid some losses.

Regret Aversion vs. Loss Aversion

Loss aversion and regret aversion may sound to be similar. However, in reality, they are quite different. Investors who are loss averse do not have problems making decisions. They just tend to make the wrong decisions because of emotional factors. On the other hand, regret aversion is a paralyzing fear because of which the investor is not able to make any decision. The likely outcome of loss aversion is a wrong decision, whereas the likely outcome of regret aversion is no decision at all! People with regret aversion always avoid taking any risks. They are known for choosing the safest path. On the other hand, people with loss aversion hate losses and may sometimes take excessive risks to turn their losses into profits.

How Regret Aversion Impacts Behaviour

Risk aversion causes investors to behave in some typical ways. The details of these ways have been mentioned below:

  • Herding Effect: People who experience a lot of regrets are often not sure of their own decisions. This is the reason that they try to find validation in the decisions made by others. When their decision matches with the crowd, they feel that the potential for future regret has been minimized.

  • Preference for Blue Chip Stocks: Regret aversion causes people to choose famous stocks like blue-chip stocks. Investors experiencing regret aversion are afraid of taking personal responsibility by investing in stocks that are not well known to the general public. These investors will never be able to pick up a stock early and gain from its upside because of their regret aversion.

  • Conservatism: Many investors who experience regret aversion want to simply avoid risky investments. Instead, they are happy choosing investments that provide lesser returns because of the safety involved. In the long run, this could lead to underperformance and sub-optimal outcomes for the investor.

How to Avoid Regret Aversion?

The real problem with risk aversion is that it causes people to invest too conservatively. Hence, investors need to be aware of this bias and take appropriate investing decisions. A couple of strategies to help do so have been listed below:

  • Diversification: Regret aversion bias basically revolves around risk avoidance. However, in order to avoid risk, it is not necessary to avoid equity as an asset class altogether. It has already been ascertained that the risk involved in equity investments can be reduced by diversification. Hence, when an investor who is affected by the regret aversion psychology creates a diversified portfolio, they can reduce the cognitive dissonance that they face.

  • Long Term View: Secondly, it is important for equity investors to have a long-term view of their investments. This means that the investors should keep in mind that a well-diversified equity portfolio is fairly safe and provides decent returns in the long run. This will help them overcome their regret aversion.

The bottom line is that regret aversion, like other psychological biases, can be dealt with. People who have more control over their regret aversion tendencies have a higher chance of being successful in the stock market.

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why are Corporations Hoarding Trillions in Cash?

Admin

Why College Education Should Not Be Free?

Admin

Why Do Mutual Funds Lend To Promoters?

Admin