Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

In the previous article, we talked about Facebook’s plan of becoming a social media conglomerate by merging different apps like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram. We also spoke about the enormous economic benefits that Facebook as a corporation will derive from the merger of these diverse apps.

However, for the moment, it does not seem like this is a win-win situation for the users of Facebook. Ever since the news of the merger has been announced, the world has gone into overdrive trying to predict what the adverse effects of such a merger on the users would be.

In this article, we will have a closer look at some of the implications that this mega tech merger will have on the lives of Facebook users.

Privacy: Privacy is always the biggest concern when it comes to Facebook. The company is notorious for having lax data standards. It was also at the centre of a major controversy when data from Facebook users was shared with third party companies in order to influence the outcome of the 2016 Presidential Election.

Given Facebook’s bad reputation, it is only logical that all the privacy authorities in the world are overly concerned about user privacy. The problem with merging Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram is the fact that only Whatsapp supports end to end encryption. In simpler words, if a person on Whatsapp sends a message to another person, the message can only be read by the other person. It cannot be intercepted by Whatsapp in between. Whatsapp is not aware of the content of the message since it is encrypted. It merely passes the data from one person to another.

This is not the case with Facebook Messenger and Instagram. Facebook messenger allows people to switch on end-to-end encryption if they use the “secret conversations” functionality. On the other hand, Instagram users do not have any such feature.

Now, the problem is that Facebook wants users on one platform to be able to message users on the other platforms. Hence, if a user on Instagram is able to send a message to a Whatsapp user, will that message be encrypted or not be encrypted. If the encryption of the message is compromised, then that will raise security concerns for Whatsapp users.

Many critics believe that Facebook is purposely allowing cross-platform messaging. They are trying to do so in order to circumvent the end-to-end encryption that has been put into place by Whatsapp. The entire business model of Facebook revolves around providing more relevant ads to Facebook users. If they are able to eavesdrop on people’s private conversations, they may be able to provide more relevant ads since they will know the user’s point of view and concerns. Hence, the removal of end-to-end encryption is beneficial for Facebook whereas it isn’t beneficial for the users.

Besides doubting Facebook’s intentions, critics also doubt Facebook’s technical ability to merge these three platforms into one. It will require an extremely comprehensive effort since all the apps will have to be built from the ground up. However, if Facebook decides to undertake this humungous effort, it could provide better security features. Security is always better provided when it is thought of, at the design stage itself.

Hacking: As mentioned above, the end-to-end encryption of the merged entity may be compromised. This means that it will be possible for hackers to intercept some of the messages which are flowing on these applications.

The possibility of hacking is a scary thought. This is because people trust these apps with a lot of intimate data including sensitive personal and financial information. If the security of the aforementioned data is compromised, the utility of this app will be greatly reduced for the average person. After merging the apps, Facebook will have a mammoth task of convincing its users that the applications are still secure in order to avoid any loss of market share.

The social media market has many apps which can compete with Whatsapp. At the moment, people are not switching to other apps because of network externalities. Once a significant number of people decide to leave these apps, it will be easier for the competition to gain a foothold into what seems like Facebook territory.

Antitrust: Lastly, it needs to be understood that Whatsapp, Facebook, and Instagram are all billion dollar enterprise. They are all market leaders in their own right. This is the reason if these firms combine they will have to face antitrust laws. All the firms combined could create a monopoly which could hinder the interests of customers by preventing fair competition. It is for this reason that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg will have to be extremely careful about the legal nuances of this merger.

The bottom line is that Facebook merger is likely to run into a lot of regulatory hurdles. The company will also have to convince critics as well as its user base that there is merit in the merger. The question now arises, does Facebook want to undertake such a humungous effort in order to undertake the merger?

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why are Corporations Hoarding Trillions in Cash?

Admin

Why College Education Should Not Be Free?

Admin

Why Do Mutual Funds Lend To Promoters?

Admin