Why are Corporations Hoarding Trillions in Cash?
February 7, 2025
Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]
What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]
How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]
Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]
In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]
It is often believed that the role of the investment banker is to sell the company for the highest price. The conventional belief is that the higher the price, the more successful the issue has been. However, over the years, the management of issuing companies, as well as investment bankers, have painfully discovered that a higher price post an IPO does not necessarily mean that a company is doing well. Instead, a higher price post an IPO can lead to a wide variety of problems. Some of these problems have been mentioned in this article.
If the informed investors find that the stock is grossly overvalued and there is very little possibility that the fundamental value of the stock will ever catch up to what is currently being offered at the market, they will start selling.
We have already studied in previous articles that institutional, as well as informed investors, tend to have large holdings of the stock of major companies. If they start selling the stock, then the market will be flooded with stock for sale. The end result would be an overcorrection, which would lead the price to crash.
In short, the overvaluation of a share is a temporary phenomenon that would sooner or later become the cause of a crash.
The investors start expecting a higher standard of returns from the companies. This higher expectation is seen in the form of pressure that is built around the quarterly results.
The company would be forced to undertake riskier projects in order to satisfy the need for a higher IRR and cash flow, which would ultimately justify the higher valuation. Over time, it is likely that the risky projects being undertaken would do more harm than good.
Instead of fudging numbers in order to live up to the hype, these companies would have been better off had they simply admitted the overvaluation and allowed the stock to settle at a fairly valued price.
Almost all companies which end up committing fraud start doing it just to meet the high expectations set up by the investors as a result of the overvaluation. Companies like Enron, WorldCom, and Waste Management are testimony to this face!
For instance, if company A has an overvalued share, it will try to exchange its overvalued shares for the real assets of company B. By doing so, it would have pre-empted the market. By the time the market realizes that the shares are overvalued, the company would have already acquired real valuable assets as a result of the overvaluation. Sometimes these strategies do succeed.
However, over time, the market has realized that if a company is hurriedly undertaking an acquisition and is using its stock to pay for it, the company is probably overvalued. Hence, the announcement of such a deal leads to a correction in the value of the acquirer’s shares. Also, even if the deal goes through, these acquisitions often fail. This is because these acquisitions are carried out in a hurried manner. Hence, they often lack due diligence, and something or the other goes wrong in this complex process of acquisition.
In many cases, it has been seen that when the valuation is particularly high, promoters sell their shares. This is done to encash the shares at a higher valuation and then later use the proceeds to buy even more shares when the valuation actually settles down. However, there is a time lag between selling the shares and then actually buying them back. There is a chance that the promoter may misappropriate the funds in this time lag.
Also, since direct selling of promoters’ shares is reported, some promoters pledge their shares to liquidate them when the valuation gets high. In many parts of the world, these pledging transactions also have to be reported.
The bottom line is that the task of the investment banker is to ensure that the shares of the company trade at a fair valuation once they are listed. The drawbacks of being undervalued are obvious. However, there are several drawbacks to the shares being overvalued as well.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *