Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

McKinsey 7S model was developed by Robert Waterman and Tom Peters during early 1980s by the two consultants McKinsey Consulting organization. The model is a powerful tool for assessing and analyzing the changes in the internal situation of an organization.

It is based on 7 key elements, which determine the organization’s success, which should be interdependent and aligned for producing synergistic outcomes. The model can be used widely in various situations where an alignment is required:

  1. For improving organizational performance.

  2. Analyzing and evaluating the effects of futuristic changes on the organization.

  3. Can be a useful framework during the situation of Merger and Acquisition involving striking an alignment between the key processes of an organization.

  4. Providing a recommendative framework for implementing a strategic plan of action.

  5. The model can be effectively applied to various teams or groups or projects as well.

The McKinsey 7 S model refers to the seven key interrelated or integrated elements of an organization which are subdivided into hard and soft elements:

The Hard elements are within the direct control of the management as it can be easily defined and identified. The following elements are the hard elements in an organization.

  1. Strategy: It is the plan of action, or the roadmap or the blueprint by way of which an organization gains a competitive advantage or a leadership edge.

  2. Structure: This refers to organizational structure or the reporting pattern.

  3. Systems: This includes the day to day activities in which the staff members involve themselves for ensuring the completion of their assigned tasks.

The Soft elements are less tangible and are difficult to be defined and identified as such elements are more governed by the culture. But according to the proponents of this model, these soft elements are equally important as the hard elements in determining an organization’s success as well as growth in the industry. The following elements are the soft elements in an organization:

  1. Shared Values: The superordinate goals or the core values which get reflected within the organizational culture or influence the code of ethics.

  2. Style: This lays emphasis on the leadership style and how it influences the strategic decisions, people motivation and organizational performance.

  3. Staff: The general staff or the capabilities of the employees

  4. Skills: The core competencies or the key skills of the employees play a vital role in defining the organizational success.

McKinsey 7S Change Model

McKinsey 7S Model

As per the above diagram, the shared values in the center of the model influence all the other elements of the model which are interconnected and interrelated. The rest other elements originate from the very reason for the existence of the organization which is the vision which is formed by the creators of the values in an organization. If the values change, the rest other parameters equally undergo a change.

The 7S model identifies the inconsistencies or gaps between various elements and provides a strategic plan of action for reaching from the current state to the desired organizational state. The alignment between each element can be checked by paying attention to the following steps:

  • Assessing the Shared Values: Assessing whether the shared values are in consistency with the elements such as structure, systems and strategy and if not then determining what may be changed.

  • Assessing the Soft Elements as well as the Hard Elements in terms of interdependence and alignment between them and the possible course of action if these elements do not support each other.

  • Making changes or adjustments and then analyzing whether these elements function in alignment or not.

According to Waterman and Peters, this model can be used by following five steps:

  1. The first step involves identification of those elements of the framework which do not align properly. It equally involves assessing the inconsistencies in the relationships between all the elements.

  2. The second step is concerned with the organizational design optimally and this optimal fit will be different for different organizations.

  3. The third step involves deciding the course of actions or the changes which are required to be implemented.

  4. The fourth step is the actual implementation of the change and

  5. The final stage or the fifth stage is the final review of the 7S framework.

Limitations of 7S Model

  • Ignores the importance of the external environment and depicts only the most crucial elements in this model for explaining the interdependence of the key processes and factors within the organization.

  • The model does not explain the concept of organizational effectivness or performance explicitly.

  • The model has been criticized for lacking enough empirical evidences to support to support their explanation.

  • The model is considered to be more of a static kind of model.

  • It is rather difficult to assess the degree of fit with accuracy successfully.

  • Criticized for missing out the intricate or finer areas in which the actual gaps in conceptualization and execution of strategy may arise.

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

Admin

Personal Grooming Tips for Women

Admin

Politics in Virtual Workplace

Admin