Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo are arguably the best soccer players in the world. Their performance in the recently concluded FIFA World Cup was highly viewed as well as highly scrutinized by the critics. Their fans often argue and even fight over who is better than the other. Their supremacy over the soccer field is unparalleled as both are amongst the highest paid athletes in the world. Cristiano Ronaldo beats Lionel Messi by a slight margin in this regard.

However, there is another eerie similarity between Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo, they are both convicted criminals! This might come as a shock for many soccer fans. However, this is true. Lionel Messi and his father Jorge were sentenced to 21 months in prison by the Spanish authorities. The same is the case with Cristiano Ronaldo who has been sentenced to 24 months in prison. Both athletes have been ordered to pay fines running into millions of Euros along with the imprisonment. Both star athletes have been convicted of the same crime, i.e., tax evasion. However, since Spain considers probation to be equivalent to imprisonment, none of them have had to spend time behind bars.

In this article, we will have a closer look at some of the taxation scandals that have rocked the lives of start players such as Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi.

Messi and Ronaldo’s Use of Shell Companies

Players like Messi and Ronaldo receive a significant amount of money from their respective clubs in the form of compensation for image rights. This is because the clubs monetize their image by selling merchandise in their names because of their superior performance. These fees add up to a significant amount and run to the tune of millions of Euros per year.

Both Ronaldo and Messi used offshore shell companies to receive these amounts from their respective clubs. It was no surprise that these shell companies were located in tax havens which tend to give favorable tax treatment to the rich.

Ronaldo and Messi then filed their tax returns without stating the income received from image rights. In their opinion, since this income was not earned in Spain, there was no reason to state the same to the Spanish authorities. The Spanish authorities had a different stand. They believed that Ronaldo and Messi each defrauded the government by around 14 million Euros.

Tax Planning vs. Tax Fraud

The use of tax havens in order to receive incomes is not really a technique that Messi and Ronaldo invented. This is done by several large corporations, and they don’t seem to receive prison sentences! In fact, not planning taxes by structuring the business in a proper way is akin to throwing money away. Then why is it that Messi and Ronaldo were convicted of tax fraud:

Misstatement: The criminal convictions related to tax frauds have started happening now. In reality, many footballers have been using shell companies to dodge Spanish tax authorities for a long time. The problem in the case of Ronaldo and Messi is that they did not disclose that they were earning a certain amount of money in image rights overseas. Ronaldo, for instance, stated only 10% of his image rights as income in Spain. This is because he was getting paid by global companies such as Nike, Adidas, Coca-Cola, Castrol, and Herbalife. Ronaldo’s defense was that since these companies are global in nature and the payment has been made outside Spanish borders, there is no reason for him to state this income in Spain.

However, the tax authorities in Spain seemed to have a different opinion about the percentage of income that was being earned in Spain. This is where the football superstar faced prosecution and was finally convicted of tax fraud. The same has been the case with Lionel Messi. In his case, the prosecutors had a few more points to add. They are listed below.

Opaqueness: The Spanish prosecutors added that Lionel Messi’s transactions were structured like a money laundering transaction. If the money was to be spent to a particular destination, it was not routed directly. In fact, a web of shell companies and fictitious transactions was used to obscure the trail of the money that was being sent. The Spanish prosecutors came down heavily on this fact. They were of the opinion that Messi was aware of the illegalities of his activities. Why else, would he bear incorporation expenses and set up companies to do fictitious transactions. The opaqueness of the transactions was used as proof against Lionel Messi.

Ignorance: Lionel Messi claimed ignorance about the deals. He was of the opinion that his finances were being managed by his father, Jorge Horacio Messi. He stated that he was only worried about playing football and did not pay much attention to financial matters. His counsel pleaded that his only fault was that he was signing complicated papers without truly understanding what they meant. However, the Spanish prosecutors did not agree. They were of the opinion that a person who has an income as large as Messi has a moral obligation to be aware of where the funds are being routed.

To sum it up, Ronaldo and Messi have been able to dodge many defenders in the football world. However, they could not dodge Spain’s tax authorities. The criminal conviction has negatively affected the image of these great players. It has also served as a precedent for other highly paid athletes in Spain and other European countries.

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why are Companies Constantly Upgrading their ERP Systems?

Admin

It’s Now or Never: Why Business Must Embrace Sustainability before it is Too Late

Admin

The Pharma Sector and Intellectual Property Rights: Pros and Cons

Admin