Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

In the previous few articles, we have studied how reinsurance contracts work. We now have a deep understanding of the type of relationship between the ceding insurance company as well as the reinsurer.

We now know about the various types of clauses which are commonly included in the reinsurance contract as well as the financial losses that a reinsurance contract must provide the ceding insurer cover against.

However, it is important to note that the reinsurer is not always liable for the losses which are incurred by the ceding insurance company. There are some very clear exclusions to any reinsurance contract which limit the liability of the reinsurance company.

This article provides details about these limits which commonly apply to reinsurance contracts.

  • Negligence: The reinsurance company expects the ceding insurance company to do any underwriting only after conducting their due diligence. If it is proved that the ceding insurance company has not conducted its due diligence, then it is possible for the reinsurer to deny paying the claim to the ceding insurer.

    Reinsurance companies underwrite the policies issued by the ceding insurer on a good faith basis. However, most reinsurance contracts ensure that the reinsurance service provider has the right to demand the relevant documentation and check whether the policies were issued after due diligence. This is important to ensure that the ceding insurance company does not indulge in reckless underwriting since they know that they will not be bearing all or most of the losses which result from it.

  • Ex-Gratia Payments: An ex-gratia payment is a payment made by a ceding insurance company that they are not legally required to make.

    Ceding insurance companies generally make these payments in order to protect their reputation or to ensure the loyalty and repeat business of a client.

    Since the ceding insurance company is not liable to make such payments as a part of their policy terms and conditions, these are generally not covered under the terms of the reinsurance policy. However, many times customized reinsurance policies are drawn up in order to ensure that a portion of the ex-gratia payment is covered.

  • Errors and Omissions: Insurance companies are expected to make full and complete disclosures while obtaining a reinsurance policy. Any failure to submit the required information, whether intentionally or unintentionally makes the reinsurance policy voidable.

    Since ceding insurance companies aggregate a large number of policies simultaneously, the reinsurance company generally provides them some time to ensure that all the relevant information has been furnished to the reinsurance company. While accepting the business, reinsurance companies take all the information at face value because of the good faith principle. However, while actually paying out the claims, the information is extensively verified to unearth any error or omission which may have happened.

  • Extraordinary Risks: There are certain extraordinary risks that are specifically excluded by reinsurance policies. For instance, in many parts of the world, terrorism risks are specifically excluded from general reinsurance coverage.

    There are special covers that ceding insurance companies need to purchase in order to cover the risk of terrorism. Unforeseen events such as pandemics are also not covered under many reinsurance policies! This clause caused a lot of ceding insurance companies to lose money during the pandemic. It also led to a lot of regulatory as well as legal battles. As a result, now pandemics are not considered to be extraordinary risks and are included in most reinsurance policies.

    Generally, the reinsurance company will specify the exact nature of extraordinary risks that they plan to exclude from the policy. For example, most reinsurance policies will explicitly specify that losses arising from nuclear risks are not included in their policy.

  • Lack of Timeliness: Ceding insurance companies are expected to cooperate with the reinsurance company when making reinsurance claims. This means that the ceding insurance company is supposed to be aware of the procedures which have been set by the reinsurer to make the claim. Also, they must be aware of the documents which need to be submitted and must do so in a timely manner.

    The reinsurance company also has a responsibility to send reminders to the ceding insurance company. However, if the ceding insurer does not make a timely claim or is unable to provide the required documents to substantiate their claim, then the reinsurance company has the right to reject the claim.

The fact of the matter is that there are several exclusions that can absolve the reinsurance company of any liability when it comes to making reinsurance payments. The above list is only indicative in nature.

It is possible for the reinsurer or the reinsured to add or remove any exclusion to the list at their convenience. It is important for the ceding insurance company to be completely aware of such exclusions since the lack of awareness can threaten the very existence of the ceding insurance company!

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

Admin

Personal Grooming Tips for Women

Admin

Politics in Virtual Workplace

Admin