Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks
February 7, 2025
Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]
The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat WhistleblowersWhat is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]
Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen MonksHow Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]
Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic StrategiesGeopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]
Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional FranchisesIn the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]
In the previous articles, we have already studied about the concept of reinsurance. However, the reinsurance we have studied is a contract between two independent parties. This means that a ceding insurance company often transfers the risk to an external third-party reinsurance service provider.
The risk actually moves out of the balance sheet of the ceding entity and even the ceding group. However, this is not necessarily the case. There are many ceding insurance companies that have another entity from their own group which acts as a group reinsurance company. These ceding insurers generally follow a strategy which is called intra-group reinsurance.
In this article, we will explain what intragroup reinsurance is and why it is considered to be effective by many ceding insurance corporations.
As mentioned above, some ceding insurance companies have their own reinsurance companies which form a part of the group. Hence, instead of ceding their insurance to a third-party reinsurance company, they cede it to their own group reinsurer. When this strategy is used, the risk is transferred out of the balance sheet of a particular entity of the group. However, it is added to the balance sheet of another entity within the group. Hence, the level of risk within the group continues to remain the same after intragroup reinsurance. The group reinsurance company generally consolidates the risk of the entire group and then decides whether to keep it on its balance sheet or use retrocession to transfer it to a third party.
Intragroup reinsurance may not be a suitable strategy for each and every ceding insurance company. There are certain factors that must be present in place in order to allow intragroup reinsurance to function.
Generally, if there are any minority stakeholders in company A or B, this may not be possible since the minority shareholders may allege that their interests are being compromised and the other group company is benefitting at their expense. However, if the subsidiaries are fully owned by the parent company, then it may be possible to use the capital in a fungible manner.
Regulatory agencies want to ensure that they have complete control over the risk. Hence, they generally do not permit the risk to be transferred overseas.
Intragroup reinsurance is used by many companies since there are certain benefits to using the same. Some of the most common benefits have been listed below:
It is important to note that transfer pricing laws apply to reinsurance companies as well. Hence, the transfer of risk has to be fairly priced as per market rates.
These economies of scale allow the companies to have the required bargaining power which further allows them to lower the cost of reinsurance and increase their own bottom line!
There are many ceding insurance companies who would like to keep the risk on their books but are compelled by the regulations to transfer the risks to a reinsurance company. In such cases, they use their own reinsurance companies in order to be able to comply with the regulation and still continue to keep the risk on their own books.
Group reinsurance companies allow a cash-starved subsidiary to offload some of the risks to the parent and obtain cash in hand. This cash in hand is then used to obtain more market share by underwriting more policies. Hence, the group reinsurance company acts as an entity that provides reinforcement of capital to other group entities that have the highest chance of underwriting viable businesses.
The fact of the matter is that intra-group reinsurance companies are an important part of the overall economic structure used by large-scale ceding insurance companies. They also form a small but important part of the overall reinsurance industry.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *