Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

We all know about initial public offerings. These events are held to issue new stock and sell them to the general population. The stock has value because it is a claim on the underlying assets of the company. However, very few of us are aware of the term initial coin offerings. These events are also known as “token sales” or “token launches”. In simpler words, initial coin offerings are like the IPO’s for cryptocurrencies. These events have been very successful in the year 2017 when the cryptocurrency market was booming. One company was able to raise as much as $34 billion in only 30 seconds! It is for this reason that there is a lot of curiosity around initial coin offerings. In this article, we will have a closer look at these coin offerings.

Initial Public Offerings vs. Initial Coin Offerings

There is a huge difference between initial public offerings and initial coin offerings.

  1. In an initial public offering, companies sell ownership of their assets. The people who buy the stock end up becoming a partner in the business. The money thus obtained can be used by the company indefinitely to continue operations.

  2. On the other hand, in an initial coin offering, no transfer of ownership takes place. In a token sale, digital companies sell tokens which will be an integral part of their online product once the company becomes operational. The benefit is that the company can know about the popularity of their proposed product. Only people who will be interested in the product at a later date will buy the tokens today!

Also, it needs to be noted that the company is under no obligation to refund the money taken from the investors. In effect, the company obtains interest-free working capital from the sale of these tokens. The investors, on the other hand, can use the token to buy the product once it is ready. However, they also have the right to transfer the ownership of this token to someone else. In both circumstances, the ownership of the tech company does not change hands. The tokens merely represent claims on the products of the company and not on the assets of the company.

In 2017, the quantum of money raised via initial coin offerings has been mindboggling. This model has started to worry investors since they believe that fields like venture capital and private equity will become obsolete since tech companies will be able to source money directly from the customers via initial coin offerings.

Problems with Initial Coin Offerings

Lack of Regulation: One of the biggest problems with the initial coin offerings is that they are unregulated. Tech companies smartly claim that they are selling a product and not a security. Hence, they should not be regulated. In the absence of regulation, investors are falling prey to pump and dump schemes. This means that willful investors are indulging in insider trading to raise the price of the token. Then they sell it to unsuspecting outside buyers, sell it at inflated prices and cash out. The United States has started regulating many of these tokens. Since they have the features of securities, they should be regulated as such even though they are technically products.

Ponzi Schemes: Many of the coins being sold via initial coin offerings do not even exist. For instance, in one case, investors were duped saying that the proceeds from the sale of the coin will be invested in the real estate market. The seller of these coins also claimed that they had a team of lawyers and consultants in place to proceed with the transactions. However, later it was found out that there was no team in place and also no investments were made in real estate. Instead, initial coin offerings were simply used by people as a way of embezzling money from gullible investors. Since the sale of tokens did not constitute a sale of a security, there were no regulatory checks. Therefore, it is necessary that initial coin offerings be brought into the regulatory ambit to prevent such frauds from happening in the future.

Safety Issues: Since these tokens are held in digital wallets, the investors are completely dependent upon these wallets to protect the safety of these investments. This means that if there is a security flaw, the value of the token can plummet within seconds. This has happened with a cryptocurrency called DAO. The wallets of various investors were hacked because of a small flaw in the coding. The end result was that tokens worth more than $50 million were stolen by online thieves. The investors did not have any possible way to protect themselves from the fraud. Hence, it can be said that there are grave safety issues with these offerings.

The entire world is protesting against the use of cryptocurrencies. China has made it illegal to issue and trade digital currency. Similarly, other countries like South Korea and Australia are following suit. In many countries like India and the United States, the trading has not been made illegal. However, banks and other intermediaries are not providing the network required to trade these currencies. Hence, it can be said that the future of cryptocurrencies, as well as initial coin offerings, is in jeopardy.

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why are Corporations Hoarding Trillions in Cash?

Admin

Why College Education Should Not Be Free?

Admin

Why Do Mutual Funds Lend To Promoters?

Admin