Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

India and China are two of the fastest growing economies in the world. They are also neighbors and share a huge boundary spanning thousands of kilometers. However, they do not share an amicable relationship. India and China have fought a full-fledged war in 1962. Even after the war, skirmishes between the two emerging nations have been the norm.

One such skirmish took place in 2018 at Doklam which is the tri-junction of India, China, and Bhutan. There were fiery speeches being made both by India as well as China. In the end, good sense prevailed, and a resolution was reached. However, it is a fact that many activists on the Indian side believe that China is an enemy. China’s unflinching support to Pakistan does not do much help to diffuse the situation. There have been several threats being issued by Indian nationalist groups. These groups call for a total and complete boycott of Chinese goods. However, is the situation really so bad? Is a boycott even required? If so, will India be able to boycott these goods successfully?

In this article, we will try to skip through the rhetoric and look at the facts.

Does India Need To Boycott Chinese Goods?

Regardless of what the nationalistic groups might feel, China is a strategic trade partner for India. India imports more than 16% of its goods from China. Also, this number has been rapidly rising. On an average each year, Indians import 12% more from China than they did in the previous year.

It is also true that the trade deficit between India and China is massive. This is because India exports $2.5 billion worth of goods to China. Whereas on the other hand, it imports more than $50 billion worth of goods! Indian nationalistic groups believe that this trade deficit is not because Chinese firms are more efficient. Instead, they believe that the trade deficit is because of the predatory practices followed by the Chinese government. Chinese goods are usually about 10% cheaper than their Indian counterparts. However, it is also a fact that the Chinese government provides about 17% subsidy to their exporters. Hence, in a way, the competitive advantage of the Chinese companies is only because of their government’s intervention.

It is true that Chinese companies are more efficient than Indian companies. Since India’s infrastructure is not well developed, Indian firms spend 9% more on transportation, energy, and logistics. However, this cost advantage is nullified by the import duties that India imposes on Chinese goods. The real advantage comes from the government subsidies mentioned above as well as the ability of Chinese companies to borrow cheaply from their banks. On an average, Indian companies have to borrow at 11% whereas Chinese government banks lend to their companies at around 6%. Many Chinese firms have also been accused of using trans-shipment routes to evade duties. For instance, Chinese firms ship goods to Bhutan and then to India. This is done to avoid duties.

All these instances have led many to believe that China is a fierce competitor. The idea that Indian consumers should continue spending money on goods which hurt Indian interests is unacceptable to many. This is the reason why several calls have been made to boycott Chinese goods.

Is a Total Boycott Possible?

  • India imports a lot of products from China. Some of these products are raw materials such as steel, minerals, etc. Others are finished products. It may be possible for India to stop the import of finished goods. It may not be economically beneficial. However, it may at least be possible. However, when it comes to raw materials such as steel and minerals, imports can’t really be stopped. It may be possible to switch the source of imports from China to another country. However, it won’t really make sense. If China is selling at a competitive price, some other country will buy these products. India will only harm its own economy by refusing to buy cheaper commodities!
  • Many Chinese companies have started their Indian operations recently. This has been made possible by the “Make In India” campaign started by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. If a total boycott of Chinese goods is issued, these companies will also face pressure from China to stop production in India. The end result will be a loss of employment in huge numbers.
  • Also since China only imports $2.5 billion worth from India, it can afford to buy from other countries and yet it’s GDP will not be impacted as much. On the other hand, since India imports from China in large quantities, it will not be easy for India to find a replacement for Chinese goods. Finding a substitute source which can match the cost and availability of Chinese products will be a difficult task. This is the reason why Indian GDP will be more impacted in this scenario.

The bottom line, therefore, is that Indian companies need to work harder before they can compete with the Chinese. The government also needs to chip in by providing better infrastructure and by reducing the rate at which loans are given to Indian corporations. Only when the gap between India and China is narrowed, can India boycott Chinese goods. If such a boycott is done now, it will hurt Indian interests more.

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why are Companies Constantly Upgrading their ERP Systems?

Admin

It’s Now or Never: Why Business Must Embrace Sustainability before it is Too Late

Admin

The Pharma Sector and Intellectual Property Rights: Pros and Cons

Admin