Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Behavioral financial analysts have conducted a significant amount of research in order to understand how investors process loss. In the process, they have found out that most investors have an innate aversion to losses. This causes them to make wrong decisions while investing. In this article, we will have a closer look at what loss aversion is and how it impacts the psychology of the people investing in the stock market.

What is Loss Aversion?

There is a famous saying in Wall Street. The saying goes like this, “There are two rules in financial markets.”

Rule #1: Don’t lose money

Rule #2: Don’t forget rule #1

This saying explains the psychology that drives a lot of investment decisions. Investors often become psychologically involved with their investments. This is the reason that they see a financial loss as a personal failure. For instance, ideally, investors should get about the same amount of joy from earning $500 as compared to the pain they would get while losing $500. However, researchers have conducted studies and concluded that the pain of losing money is actually far greater than the joy of earning money. This is the reason why investors make a lot of irrational decisions in order to avoid that pain.

Some of these irrational decisions have been listed below:

Early Profit Booking: A lot of investors are fixated on finding winners. This is the reason that if they invest in a stock and it rises even slightly, then the investors want to book their profits and exit the investment. This often means that even if they find a winner, they are not willing to provide it enough time to reach its full potential.

Instead, as soon as the rising price shows the slightest downtrend, investors exit the stock due to loss aversion. They are unable to think rationally. Instead, they are driven by the need to appear to be a success and can’t risk being seen as a failure.

Obviously, if profits are booked too early, then the investors lose out on opportunities. In the short run, investors may feel like they have earned money. However, in the long run, they would have lost out on significant opportunities.

Smart investors try to control their innate loss aversion tendencies and hold on to a stock if it has the potential to be a winner.

Holding on to Losers: Loss aversion causes investors to do the exact opposite of what they should be doing when faced with a losing stock. Let’s assume that an investor buys a stock, and it goes down in value because its fundamentals have deteriorated.

Loss aversion fallacy will cause the investors to hold on to the stocks despite there being no future for them. Selling the stocks at a loss would be seen as a personal loss to the investors. Hence, they do not sell the stocks because they feel that sooner or later, the prices will recover. However, because of this fallacy, investors often forget that there is a time period involved in the calculation as well.

For instance, if an investor buys a stock for $100 and sells it for $101 after two years, he/she has earned just 0.5% return on an annual basis. However, since loss causes them immense pain, they are willing to do so.

A good rule of thumb for investors is to check their portfolio. If their portfolio has a couple of winners followed by numerous losers, they are probably affected by loss aversion.

In most situations, people keep churning the winners while irrationally holding on to the losers.

Taking Excessive Risks: Loss aversion often causes investors to take a lot of unnecessary risks. For example, if investors face a loss, instead of accepting the loss, they often try to gain from it.

A common strategy is called averaging out the prices. This means that if you have 100 shares of a company at $10 a share and the price slips to $8, investors tend to buy 200 shares. This is done so that the average cost of the share is reduced. In this case, the investor would now have 300 shares at $260, i.e., at $8.66 per share.

The idea is that now if the share moves to $9 per share, they would recover the losses of the earlier lot purchased at $10 as well. This is a fallacy because buying or not buying at $8 should not depend on the earlier decision. This sort of behavior is often seen in casinos wherein gamblers tend to double their bets to recover their previous losses. The problem with this strategy is obvious.

If the prices don’t move up and actually move further down, then the losses get multiplied!

Avoiding Equity Stocks: In some cases, investors have burnt their hands so badly that they avoid any kind of investing in equity markets. Instead, they keep most of their funds tied up in fixed income securities. This is detrimental for young investors who may have a risk appetite.

Sell Offs: Most importantly, loss aversion causes people to panic and try to cut their losses when the market goes down sharply. This is the exact opposite of what should be done.

Smart investors are the ones who are buying when the market is going down.

The bottom line is that investors must be aware of the psychological fallacy of loss aversion. Awareness will help them manage the emotions and therefore earn superior returns.

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why are Corporations Hoarding Trillions in Cash?

Admin

Why College Education Should Not Be Free?

Admin

Why Do Mutual Funds Lend To Promoters?

Admin