Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Technically, the term hedge fund does not exist. In fact, the term hedge fund applies to any fund which is sold to accredited private investors and does not have to follow through with the regulation process! Now, investment advisory is a highly regulated industry and there are several laws which have been passed to ensure compliance and minimize foul play.

However, hedge funds are immune to most of these laws. This is probably the reason why investors prefer them. However, of late, experts have been lobbying to bring this trillion dollar hedge fund industry under some sort of regulation.

In this article, we will have a closer look at some of the regulations that are avoided by the hedge funds as well as arguments in favor of and against bringing hedge funds under the purview of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The Laws Avoided By Hedge Fund Managers

  • No Prospectus Required: The Securities Act 1933 mandates that any kind of securities being sold must first submit a detailed prospectus of the risks and rewards to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Only after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approves the prospectus are the funds allowed to sell to investors. However, since hedge funds are sold only to private accredited investors who do not total more than 99 in number, they do not have to follow this law,

    Also, they are exempted from other compliance procedure like submitting the details of their trade for oversight and approval, maintaining their record keeping in the prescribed manner and most importantly the limits on the amount of money that they can charge as fees.

  • Taxation: Most mutual funds are considered to be American entities if their investors as well as their operations are largely American. This subjects them to tax laws. Hence, the amount of profits that they earn by way of fees is marked down by at least 30% because of stringent tax laws. Hedge funds on the other hand, usually incorporate in a tax haven. Also, they structure their operations in a way that American tax authorities cannot lay hands on them. The small number of investors that make up hedge funds makes it possible to avoid taxes and obtain much better returns.

The Rationale for Regulations

  • Excessive Leverage: Hedge funds are defined by the amount of leverage that they undertake. Some of these funds i.e. arbitrage funds commonly use a 10:1 leverage. This creates problems for the fund itself since the likelihood of going bust increases. However, it also affects other players since hedge funds are counterparties to other regulated players like banks and mutual funds. Therefore, the inability of a hedge fund to meet its own obligations is likely to have a trickledown effect on other players as well.

  • Systemic Risk: Given that hedge funds are huge in size and that if they were to go bankrupt trillions of dollars would be lost causing a crash in the market, it is easy to see why hedge funds pose a systemic risk. It is because of this risk that detractors want hedge funds to be tightly regulated. In fact some of them believe that hedge funds are capable of causing an international systemic crisis which would lead to a collapse of economies and currencies.

    Hedge funds have been blamed for several crises. Some prominent ones are the subprime mortgage crisis and the LTCM crisis. However, proponents of hedge funds believe that the funds have come a long way and given the new and better risk management practices, a catastrophic event triggered by hedge funds seems almost impossible.

The Rationale for No Regulations

  • SEC Does Not Have The Resources: The Securities and Exchange Commission is already understaffed. They do not have the money, people or the time required to police a defiant hedge fund industry. Attempts at regulating the hedge fund industry will impact the regulatory process in other important businesses like mutual funds since resources will be diverted.

  • Investors Are Sophisticated Enough: The biggest argument against regulating hedge funds is that investors usually pool in a minimum of a hundred thousand dollars to invest into this fund. People with that kind of money are called accredited investors. It is assumed that they have the skills required to deal with these sophisticated investments. Hence putting regulations in place is considered unnecessary due to these facts. The government’s resources and money are better spent on people who need assistance and not on the super rich who wish to gamble with their money.

  • Hedge Funds Would Move Offshore: Hedge funds have always been the playground of the super rich and they are likely to remain that way. In case the government starts interfering too much and puts regulations in place, the business is likely to move to a different country. This is because both the investors and the management are in favor of no regulations. In fact the only reason why they invest in hedge funds is because of a lack of regulations.

    America is the primary market for hedge funds today. However, these funds are also spreading to other regional financial centers like London, Hong Kong and even Singapore. If the American government insists on regulation, funds may move their business outside the nation and then only the tax authorities will be the real losers.

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why are Corporations Hoarding Trillions in Cash?

Admin

Why College Education Should Not Be Free?

Admin

Why Do Mutual Funds Lend To Promoters?

Admin