Why are Companies Constantly Upgrading their ERP Systems?
February 7, 2025
Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]
The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat WhistleblowersWhat is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]
Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen MonksHow Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]
Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic StrategiesGeopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]
Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional FranchisesIn the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]
It is a known facet of globalization that businesses that operate across the world have to contend with global policies and local regulations at the same time.
In other words, these international businesses have to not only follow the global rules set by world trade bodies like the WTO (World Trade Organization), GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) and the United Nations but also have to obey the local regulations in the countries in which they operate. This is sometimes referred to as the marriage of globalization and localization, which gives rise to the term Glocalization that, was popularized by the famous cheerleader of globalization, Thomas Friedman. The implications of this adaptation are that more often than not, many international businesses have to comply with the quantum of profits that they can repatriate from the market in which they are operating.
Repatriation refers to the practice of sending back the profits from the countries in which these international businesses to their home country.
For instance, the global consumer products giants, Unilever and Proctor and Gamble have to ensure that the rules in the countries in which they operate have to be complied with during their business activities.
This has led to these giant companies having separate subsidiaries in the Asian and African countries where they have their presence so as to ensure full compliance with the local regulations.
The other aspect about international businesses is to do with the internal policies.
For instance, many multinationals have global HR (Human Resource) policies that need to be followed across all units. However, the labor laws in the specific countries in which they operate have to be taken into account as well when they formulate policies for these units.
For instance, in many Asian countries including China and India, there are strict labor laws that mandate the working hours for women and insist that the companies provide transportation in case of longer working hours. This means that the international businesses have to be cognizant of these laws and to comply with them as well.
Indeed, many multinationals often complain that they are constrained by the local rules and regulations. The rejoinder from the local authorities is that these are the costs of doing business in that country.
Perhaps no aspect of international businesses and the need to suit themselves to local rules is more important than the hiring and firing of employees. In the west, it is common for companies to hire employees when there is an economic boom and fire them when the boom bursts.
However, in many Asian countries, hiring and firing of workers has to conform to strict regulations and the companies must show evidence that the downsizing or the layoffs were warranted.
The other side of the coin is that many western companies take advantage of the lax labor laws in countries like Bangladesh, Thailand, and Indonesia to setup what are known as “sweatshops” or manufacturing units that can operate at the terms of the western companies. This has drawn howls of protest from human rights activists who complain that the western companies are exploiting the workers in these countries taking advantage of the lax labor laws.
Whichever side of the debate you are in, the fact remains that harmonizing the global rules and the local regulations is indeed a challenge for western companies seeking to do business in other parts of the world.
Added to this is the fact that in Africa, many western companies have been accused of resource theft or exploitation of the mineral and oil wealth in those countries leading to severe resistance from the locals.
Finally, we have touched upon many themes in this article and each of them is a separate topic for discussion as the dynamics between the global rules and the local regulations takes on interesting aspects of how multinationals operate.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *