Why are Corporations Hoarding Trillions in Cash?
February 7, 2025
Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]
What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]
How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]
Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]
In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]
The Indian government has been defensive about opening up its retail sector to global companies such as Wal-Mart and Amazon. This is the reason why the country only permits 100% foreign direct investment in single-brand retail. This means that companies like Levis or Benetton can own and operate stores because they only sell one single brand. On the other hand, supermarket chains sell multiple brands from the same store. As of now, the Indian government does not allow more than 49% foreign ownership in such ventures.
Over the past few years, tech giants have used the cover of technology to blur the lines between single and multi-brand retail. Companies like Flipkart and Amazon have been blatantly circumventing the law. In effect, Amazon and Flipkart have been running multi-brand retail stores with majority backing from a foreign financial company. Let’s have a closer look at the earlier structure which was being followed by e-commerce companies to understand this further.
Technically, Amazon and Flipkart act like marketplaces. This means that they claim to be companies like eBay which only provide a platform where buyers and sellers meet. It is true that Amazon and Flipkart do allow local retailers to enlist their products on their websites. However, these retailers account for a very small percentage of the total sales.
A large majority of the sales come from pass-through shell vendor companies which have been created by Amazon and Flipkart. For instance, Cloudtail sells a lot of products on Amazon. Technically cloudtail is an independent retail company whose office is registered in India. However, the reality was that Cloudtail was created only to circumvent the rules.
Hence, the wholesale arm of Amazon would directly sell to Cloudtail who would then sell to the Indian consumer. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that the existence of Cloudtail is only an eyewash. In reality, Amazon is directly operating a multi-brand retail store in India by bending the rules.
After several protests by Indian retailers, the Indian government finally took cognizance of the illegality of this operation. In order to prevent this from happening, the Indian government created a rule that retailers like Cloudtail should not be allowed to buy from companies in which more than 25% of the inventory is controlled by the e-commerce firm itself. Hence, this rule was meant to break the proxy route using which Flipkart and Amazon were breaking the law.
The Indian government was of the opinion that new regulations would put an end to the potentially illegal operation that Amazon and Flipkart had been running. The Indian government wanted these e-commerce sites to truly become marketplaces where small and medium sellers can sell their products. If the supply chain of companies like Cloudtail is broken, the smaller buyers will become more competitive. Hence, the Indian government was only trying to look after the interests of its small scale industry.
However, Flipkart and Amazon have once again used their legal think-tank to find a way to outsmart the Indian government. It turns out that the 25% rule is not enough to stop these companies from bending the rules.
It is difficult to decipher such actions and put a meaning to them. On the one hand, there are critics who believe that these acts amount to breaking the law in spirit and hence must be punished. On the other hand, many believe that Flipkart and Amazon are being innovative and avoiding the unnecessary regulation and red-tape which is coming their way.
However, it is unlikely that the Indian government will take this lying down. Since this is an election year and small traders form a huge chunk of voters, it is likely that the government will crack down on this alpha-beta strategy.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *