Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

In the previous article, we have studied the concepts of the tax base and tax rate individually. Now, it is time to see how the two react. We already know the basics to some extent. We know that the tax base and the tax rate move in opposite directions. Hence, ideally, if we increase the tax rate, the tax base will decrease, and vice versa.

In this article, we will have a closer look at this relationship and move on to the concept of elasticity of taxes.

Elasticity of Taxes

Decisions regarding corporate tax policy are made based on this relationship. The degree to which the increase in the tax rate causes a change in the tax base is called the elasticity of taxes. The concept of elasticity is very old in economics. It has been prevalent right since the time of Adam Smith when the principles of elasticity of demand were discussed.

However, when it comes to taxation, elasticity was not paid much attention to. In taxation, economics elasticity is a very recent phenomenon. However, it is quite important for a government that is looking to maximize tax revenues. We can classify taxes into three different types based on the elasticity.

Inelastic Taxes: These are taxes where a change in the tax rate has little or no effect on the tax base. Taxes levied on sin goods such as cigarettes and liquor generally fall in this category. Since the demand for these products remains more or less unchanged, increasing the tax rate leads to an increase in the tax revenue.

Unitary Elastic Taxes: These types of taxes are just theoretical constructs. They do not actually exist. As per the theory, the percentage change in the tax rate is exactly offset by the percentage change in the tax base. Hence, a 10% increment in the tax rate will cause a 10% decrease in the tax base. Since the tax revenue is the product of tax rate and tax base, it remains unchanged. The increase in one is exactly offset by the decrease in the other.

Elastic Taxes: Elastic taxes move in the opposite direction. Here increasing the tax rate lead to a decrease in the tax base. However, the percentage of both may vary. For instance, a 5% increase in the tax rate could lead to a 10% decrease in the tax base. Other times, a 10% increase in the tax rate could lead to a 2% decrease in the tax base. In such situations, raising taxes would be beneficial for the organization.

Principles of Tax Elasticity

The relationship between tax elasticity has been extensively studied in recent years. Many generalizations have been drawn in recent years. Some of them have been mentioned below:

  • Tax elasticity is thought of as being more prevalent at higher rates. This means that when tax rates are first increased, the tax base isn’t negatively affected. However, once the rates go higher, the negative impact on the tax rate becomes more apparent

  • Secondly, the elasticity of tax rates is observed more in the long run. This means that if taxes are raised for short periods of time by the government to make some quick money, the impact is not that severe.

Why is Elasticity of Taxes Difficult to Measure?

The concept of elasticity of taxes has taken a long time to penetrate into economic literature because of the following reasons.

  • Based on Potential Income: When a government raises corporate tax rates, companies do not abandon the factories that they are already operating. Hence, the effect of the tax rates is not visible unless the hike is dramatic. However, the growth rate of future tax is impacted. For instance, companies do not do any type of expansion activities once the tax rate has been increased. Instead, the same companies start outsourcing the work to lower tax companies. Also, when the factories and the equipment are depreciated, companies do not replace them. Hence, the effects of elasticity are observed only when the growth in potential tax revenue is taken into account.

  • Longer Time Periods: Demand elasticity is apparent because people stop buying goods as soon as the price is raised. However, as mentioned above, corporations have already invested a significant sum of money, which represents a long term commitment. Hence, they do not make decisions quickly. Corporate decisions to move out typically take a few years. Hence, the cause-effect relationship is not readily apparent.

  • Effect of Competition: Lastly, the concept of elasticity has become more prevalent now with tax competition. Companies can move out to other countries with lower tax rates because of the opening of political borders. The free movement of goods and services has played an integral part in this elasticity.

  • In the globalization era, the free movement of goods and elasticity was restricted. Hence, companies had a choice between continuing operations and shutting them down. They would stop operations only when the marginal costs exceeded marginal revenues. However, in this era of tax competition, companies have more choices.

The bottom line is that the concept of tax elasticity is very important. Very often, there are political debates in countries that have high debt. In such debates, the idea of raising the tax is often floated in order to increase revenue. However, now since we know about the elasticity of taxes, we know that raising taxes can sometimes lead to a fall in revenue as well.

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why are Corporations Hoarding Trillions in Cash?

Admin

Why College Education Should Not Be Free?

Admin

Why Do Mutual Funds Lend To Promoters?

Admin