The World without Bankruptcy Laws
Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]
The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers
What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]
Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks
How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]
Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies
Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]
Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises
In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]
Correlation analysis is a vital tool in the hands of any Six Sigma team. As the Six Sigma team enters the analyze phase they have access to data from various variables. They now need to synthesize this data and ensure that they are able to find a conclusive relationship.
One can best understand correlation analysis with the help of an example. Let us suppose that the management of a factory has come up with data which says that the as the shift time of the workers is increased, their productivity decreases.
However, as of now there is raw data and this is only an observation that some Six Sigma team member may have come up with after having a first look at the data. But Six Sigma methodology does not lie on opinions of the people involved but rather on objective fact. Correlation analysis will help statistically confirm the fact that this is indeed the case.
In order to perform the correlation analysis, there must be sufficient data for the variables under question. Once there is sufficient data, this data was plugged into a formula developed by Karl Pearson. This formula was famously called Karl Pearson’s co-efficient of correlation. This involved complex calculation and mandated the presence of a statistician in the Six Sigma team.
However, fortunately nowadays most of the calculations are performed by a software tool. The humans involved must merely know how to add data to the tool and how to interpret the results.
Correlation analysis typically gives us a number result that lies between +1 and -1. The +ve or ve sign denotes the direction of the correlation. The positive sign denotes direct correlation whereas the negative sign denotes inverse correlation.
Zero signifies no correlation. And the closer the number moves towards 1, the stronger the correlation is. Usually for the correlation to be considered significant, the correlation must be 0.5 or above in either direction.
Correlation analysis just confirms the fact that some given data moves in tandem. A dangerous implication that mangers make is of causality. Based on the correlation analysis it is impossible to say which variable is the cause and which is the effect? It is also likely that both the variables move in tandem because they are affected by some third common variable. However, these are just cases and the fact remains there are other analyses available to find out the causal relationship. However, in most cases the fact the variables have a correlation is enough to take relevant action.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Why are Companies Constantly Upgrading their ERP Systems?
February 7, 2025
It’s Now or Never: Why Business Must Embrace Sustainability before it is Too Late
February 7, 2025
The Pharma Sector and Intellectual Property Rights: Pros and Cons
February 7, 2025
