Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies
February 7, 2025
Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]
What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]
How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]
Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]
In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]
The field of corporate governance exists in a symbiotic relationship between the management and the board of directors. It is impossible to talk about corporate governance without taking into account the roles and duties of the board of directors and the expectations from the management. To explain this fully, it would be useful to consider the fact that unless the board of directors’ act as oversight authority effective corporate governance cannot be practiced.
In the same vein, unless the management sets their expectations from the board of directors, the latter would not be able to function. Hence, the expectations from the management ought to be articulated upfront for the board of directors to know and understand what they are supposed to do. This often manifests itself as a written or unwritten code of conduct for the board of directors to follow.
The expectations from the management can take many forms and they can be divided into oversight over their actions, guidance from professional directors on how to run the company and finally, a sharing of accountability and responsibility between the management and the board of directors.
If we take each of these by turn, we find that the board of directors is expected to perform the role of an oversight over the actions of the management and that the board should be accountable for its actions.
In recent months, in the AMR fire tragedy and the Satyam Scandal, the board was widely believed to have reneged on its oversight functions. Next, the board of directors is expected to provide professional advice and guidance to the management and the expectations of the management include sagacious and timely advice to the management from the professionals on the board on how to run the company.
The point here is that the expectations from the management cover these dimensions and a harmonious relationship between the board and the management can exist only when these dimensions are taken care of.
Further, the management cannot shirk its responsibility and hence apart from their expectations from the board, they are also deemed to behave in a manner that inspires confidence from the employees and other stakeholders.
In recent years, there has been much heartburn among investors and the stakeholders in the way in which the boards of several companies are acting as rubber stamps for the management. This trend is to be avoided and only when the board acts independently and as a custodian of shareholder and stakeholder interests can there be effective corporate governance.
Finally, the expectations from the management need to be reevaluated and reoriented periodically so that the management and the board of directors are on the same page and they have the employees and the stakeholders with them. The bottom line for effective corporate governance is a healthy balance between the expectations from the management and the functions of the board. They have to balance each others’ needs and responsibilities and have to coexist if meaningful corporate governance is desired.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *