Why are Companies Constantly Upgrading their ERP Systems?
February 7, 2025
Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]
The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat WhistleblowersWhat is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]
Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen MonksHow Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]
Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic StrategiesGeopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]
Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional FranchisesIn the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]
China has been the fastest growing economy in the world for the past few decades. The Chinese economy continued to grow even during the recession period. Many economists believe that a growing Chinese economy was a gift to other countries during the slowdown. Since the Chinese economy was growing, international trade was flourishing, and other economies didn’t fare as badly as they otherwise would have. The remarkable growth that China has achieved during the past decades and even during the recession is believed to be fuelled by copious amounts of debt.
However, Chinese policymakers are now of the opinion that they have taken on too much debt. Hence, there is a need to reduce debt, i.e. to deleverage. The big challenge with deleveraging is that it needs to be done without causing any harm to the growing economy. China wants to right size its debt. However, it does not want to sacrifice growth in the process.
In this article, we will have a closer look at the debt situation in China and the strategy being adopted by Beijing in order to deleverage the economy.
One of the biggest problems with the Chinese economy is that the numbers tend to be opaque. In the absence of precise numbers, it is difficult to understand the underlying situation and create policies. Let’s understand this with the help of an example.
Firstly, we need to understand that Chinese banks face a lot of regulatory restrictions. Hence, they tend to use roundabout ways of making loans. For instance, let’s assume that a company wants to borrow 1000RMB from Bank A. Bank A is willing to make the loan. However, existing regulations do not allow such loans.
In such a situation, bank A buys some sort of financial product from another bank B. This bank B will then use the proceeds to purchase some securitized assets from another party C. This trust selling securitized assets is not a bank and does not need to comply with banking regulations. Hence, it can lend RMB 1000 directly to the company.
The bottom line is that, instead of bank A directly lending to the company, it had to involve 3 more parties. This means that as a regulator if I look at the total loans due it will appear to be RMB 4000 whereas in reality the same RMB 1000 is owed by all parties to one another! This makes the numbers opaque. The end result is that Chinese officials have no clue about how much leverage is present in the economy!
In order to correct the problems of this opaque system, China has decided to crack down on this shadow banking system. This is one of the major ways in which the Chinese economy is deleveraging. Also, this move is likely to make the credit system more efficient. There is no need for multiple commission-seeking agencies to be involved which making every single loan. This only increases the cost of credit which hurts the Chinese economy in the long run.
The Chinese think-tank has come to the conclusion that it is not the debt which is the problem. Instead, they believe that the way in which the debt is structured is the problem. For instance, most of the growth in China has been the result of centralized planning. This means that the debt has also been borne by public companies.
The Chinese consumer, on the other hand, has a lot of savings. Instead, the Chinese consumer has the largest savings rate in the entire world. This means that they are in a position to take on more debt if required. There will be less risk of bankruptcy or insolvency given the fact that the fundamentals are strong.
The Chinese deleveraging strategy is, therefore, a plan to deleverage state-owned enterprises. On the other hand, they want to bring about a culture of consumption in their middle class. If China is able to do both these things simultaneously, then it will successfully reduce the rate of default while at the same time there will be little to no effect on the growth rate of the economy.
China had successfully started deleveraging its state economy. However, Donald Trump started his trade war. This is particularly bad news for Beijing’s future plans. Beijing has always depended on the export-led growth as the main driver of the economy.
The United States has been the biggest consumer of Chinese goods. However, now it seems that the Chinese products will attract tariffs in America. Hence, the demand for these products is likely to slow down. To counter this slowdown, Beijing will have to increase the supply of credit to its own industries.
China has already started reversing its deleveraging policy. For instance, it has cut the reserve requirements. This means that the banks now have the ability to give out more loans.
It will be interesting to see how China adjusts its strategy to ensure that they can deleverage without affecting growth. However, that may only happen in the long for. For the moment, it seems that the current deleveraging strategy has been brought to a halt.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *