Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

The United States is economically the most powerful nation in the world today. This is what makes the study of central banking in the United States all the more interesting.

Almost all other countries in the world adopted central banking without any major hassles. However, in the United States, a lot of conundrum took place before central banking could be established.

The founding fathers of America were opposed to the idea of a central bank and they had explicitly mentioned this opposition when Thomas Jefferson called central banks more dangerous than “standing armies”.

The idea of central banking was therefore considered to be unconstitutional and the general population had to be convinced to adopt this concept. In this article, we will trace the history of the three central banks that were set up in the United States.

1791 to 1811-The First Bank of United States

The First Bank of United States was proposed in the very first meeting of the first congress. Alexander Hamilton, one of the forefathers, believed that a central bank would be indispensible to facilitate the swift transfer of money across states as well as to provide credit to the state governments. However, the idea faced multiple obstacles from other leaders such as Jefferson. Despite Jefferson’s vehement opposition, the First Bank of United States came into existence in 1791 just 15 years after America gained independence.

Jefferson’s opposition was not the only obstacle faced by this bank. The conditions were not rife for banking at that time. There were over 50 different types of French, Spanish, Portuguese and American currencies in circulation at that time. Also, the banks charter was valid only for a limited period of twenty years post which it was supposed to be renewed. The first bank kept expanding its operations during the tenure. Even one year prior to the expiry of the charter, additional branches were opened along the east coast of the United States.

However, President Madison did not renew the charter of this bank in 1811 amidst rising concerns of inflation and allowed central banking in the United States to come to a sudden end for a short while. Many believe this created monetary instability which lasted for many years following 1811.

1816 to 1832: The Second Bank of United States

For the five years after the collapse of the first bank of United States, monetary instability ran rampant across the United States. The impact was large enough for the Congress to consider the creation of another Central Bank called the Second Bank of United States. This was the successor to the first bank and had virtually the same rights and privileges. The second bank also had monopoly rights over creation of paper money and regulating its value thereof.

However, the second bank faced much larger opposition as compared to the first bank.

The seventh president of the United States i.e. Andrew Jackson vehemently and publicly opposed the central bank calling it the work of “monied interests” to ensure their continued domination over the average American.

Jackson portrayed the second bank as an extremely corrupt institution that needed to be uprooted from American soil if economic independence were to be maintained. He led a campaign against the bank and finally the second bank too collapsed in 1832 even before it could complete the 20 years tenure that had been granted to it by the charter.

1913 till date: The Federal Reserve

The United States did not have a central bank from the period between 1832 and 1913. Surprisingly, the United States trade and commerce were functioning perfectly fine till the 1900’s. In the early 1900’s, the United States faced a series of financial panics and crises. Most notable amongst these crises was the crisis of 1907. Many banks ended up bankrupt during this period and people ended up losing their life’s savings. As a result, there was public clamor directing the government to bring in some regulation in the banking practice.

After many discussions and negotiations, the Federal Reserve Act was finally passed in 1913 and United States once again had a central bank. This time, the bank has stayed on for many years. One of the reasons behind this is that the charter does not have a limited validity and does not require multiple approvals from the congress every few years.

Creating the Federal Reserve was a challenge for American Senators. They had to create a system to regulate the practices of fraudulent banking. However, they also had to ensure that vested monied interests did not get an upper hand during the process. To ensure this, the Federal Reserve act created a quasi government body. This meant that although private bankers were part of the federal reserve in order to provide industry expertise, the ultimate control of the Fed’s action lay within government hands. This convinced the general population that there were no sinister motives behind the creation of the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve Act also ensured that the government does not have excessive control over the Fed. It kept the monetary policy out of the control of the President. Also, the Fed does not require Congressional approvals in the normal course of its business.

Thus, through the Federal Reserve Act, the American population has discovered the ideal mix of regulated central banking as well as avoidance of monetary meltdowns and central banking which had earlier been despised in America now found a permanent place in its economic system.

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why are Corporations Hoarding Trillions in Cash?

Admin

Why College Education Should Not Be Free?

Admin

Why Do Mutual Funds Lend To Promoters?

Admin