Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Academicians and practitioners from all over the world have been tried very hard to come up with a model which would help them to predict bankruptcy in a firm before it occurred.

In the previous article, we have already studied how the expected default frequency model was used and what its advantages and limitations were. However, it is not the only model which is used by firms to gauge how far other firms are from bankruptcy.

The Altman’s Z score model has been used extensively over the years. In this article, we will have a closer look at how the Z score model came into existence and how it can help predict bankruptcy over the long run.

History Behind the Altman’s Z Score Model

The Altman’s Z score model was developed by an American professor and researcher at the Stern University in 1968. However, it would be unfair to say that Altman’s Z score model was indigenously built by Professor Altman. Instead, it was a result of improvements over many such previous models which were developed earlier.

The idea of predicting bankruptcy shot to prominence during the 1930s. This is because of the Great Depression when hundreds of companies went bankrupt and many times endangered the financial viability of the banks and investors that lent money to them.

Over the years, many statisticians developed models to try and predict bankruptcy using financial ratios of bankrupt companies as data points. However, most of them failed. Professor Altman was able to finally devise a model which gave accurate results. Hence, the model was named after him.

The beauty of Professor Altman’s model is that it is very simple. Earlier, Dr. Altman had decided that the Z score formula should use 22 ratios. However, over time, he realized that the results were almost the same even if 5 ratios were used instead of 22. Hence, the final Altman’s Z score is a score that is derived using a weighted average of 5 ratios.

The coefficients which are assigned to the different ratios in this formula have been derived by running rigorous statistical procedures on the data derived from bankrupt firms. Data was derived from firms that went bankrupt and which didn’t go bankrupt. The data was analyzed over different periods of time. This helped isolate the five key ratios and their coefficients which now form a part of Altman’s Z score model.

The Altman’s Z score is known for being extremely accurate. During the earlier years, when this score was launched, it had an accuracy of 72% in predicting default before it actually occurred. However, over the years, the accuracy rate has increased and now the score has a 90% accuracy rate when it comes to predicting bankruptcy.

The Three Levels in The Z Score

The Z score is a score that is calculated based on the formula provided by Professor Altman. After the scores are calculated, companies are categorized into one of the three grades.

Altman Z Score

  1. Safe Zone: Companies within this score are said to be safe from bankruptcy. Unless a black swan event occurs, there is almost zero probability that these companies would go bankrupt in the next 2 years.

  2. Grey Zone: There are some companies that do not have a clear good score or a bad score. These companies are said to be in the distress zone. This means that there is a small probability that these companies may go bankrupt in the next 2 years.

  3. Distress Zone: These are the companies that are struggling with their finances. They are almost certain to default on their debts in the next one year. This can be predicted if the Altman score is lower than a certain level.

The safe, grey, and distress zones are defined based on the industry. Hence, sharing their absolute values here is not meaningful.

Limitations of The Altman’s Model

Altman’s model has some limitations. However, since this model is quite old, steps have been taken to mitigate these limitations as well.

  • The Formula for Privately Held Companies: For instance, the Altman’s Z score is a weighted average of five key ratios. Some of these ratios depend upon data from stock markets. This is the reason that the model was initially not effective for private companies. However, over time, Professor Altman created another model for privately held companies. It is called the Z’ model (Z dash model). It includes the same five ratios but the coefficients have been changed based on the data analysis done for private companies.

  • Non-Manufacturing Companies: The Altman Z score had been developed at a time when manufacturing companies were the dominant players. Hence, it was more suitable for them. However, over time, non-manufacturing companies have become dominant in the economy.

    Today, most of the top companies in the world are asset-light. Hence, to make sure that the model adapts to this changing reality, another version of the model called Altman’s Z’’ (Z double dash) model was developed.

  • In this model, the ratio which takes into account the total assets of the firm has been removed and the coefficients of other ratios have been changed in order to reflect the realities of the service industry.

The bottom line is that the Altman’s Z score is a valuable model which can be used to find out the creditworthiness of another firm. It has been used for decades to manage exposure and reduce the probability of credit loss. However, it cannot be used alone. It needs to be used in conjunction with other models in order to ensure that the right decision has been taken.

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

Admin

Personal Grooming Tips for Women

Admin

Politics in Virtual Workplace

Admin