Admin's other articles

4349 The World without Bankruptcy Laws

Bankruptcy is one of the natural states which a company may find itself in. Entrepreneurship is primarily about taking risks. When companies take risks, some of them succeed, whereas others fail. Hence failure is a natural part of the business. However, many critics of bankruptcy laws believe that there isn’t a need for an elaborate […]

4348 The Wirecard and Infosys Scandals are a Lesson on How NOT to Treat Whistleblowers

What is the Wirecard Scandal all about and Why it is a Wakeup Call for Whistleblowers Anyone who has been following financial and business news over the last couple of years would have heard about Wirecard, the embattled German payments firm that had to file for bankruptcy after serious and humungous frauds were uncovered leading […]

4347 Why the Digital Age Demands Decision Makers to be Like Elite Marines and Zen Monks

How Modern Decision Makers Have to Confront Present Shock and Information Overload We live in times when Information Overload is getting the better of cognitive abilities to absorb and process the needed data and information to make informed decisions. In addition, the Digital Age has also engendered the Present Shock of Virality and Instant Gratification […]

4346 Why Indian Firms Must Strive for Strategic Autonomy in Their Geoeconomic Strategies

Geopolitics, Economics, and Geoeconomics In the evolving global trading and economic system, firms and corporates are impacted as much by the economic policies of nations as they are by the geopolitical and foreign policies. In other words, any global firm wishing to do business in the international sphere has to be cognizant of both the […]

4345 Why Government Should Not Invest Public Money in Sports Stadiums Used by Professional Franchises

In the previous article, we have already come across some of the reasons why the government should not encourage funding of stadiums that are to be used by private franchises. We have already seen that the entire mechanism of government funding ends up being a regressive tax on the citizens of a particular city who […]

See More Article from Admin

It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout.

Visit Us

Our Partners

Search with tags

  • No tags available.

Economies of scale provide a significant advantage in the retail industry. This is the reason why all retail companies try to become bigger. However, to the surprise of many American retail giant GAP Inc has decided to reduce its size. GAP is home to many famous brands like GAP, Banana Republic, Old Navy, Athleta, Intermix, and Hill City. As per the details released to the public, the Old Navy brand will be spun off into a separate company. A new name has not been decided for this company as of now. It will be called “Newco” till a new name is decided. On the other hand, all the other brands continue to remain with GAP. The size of both new companies will be more or less similar. This means that GAP has simply broken the company into two parts.

There are many analysts who believe that it may be a good idea to do so. However, there are many others who do not believe this is the case. In this article, we will have a closer look at the GAP- Old Navy breakup and try to figure out whether this break up makes any economic sense.

Why did GAP and Old Navy Break Up?

GAP has been struggling as a company. The results have been ordinary, and investors are starting to lose confidence. The Old Navy brand stands out as a clear performer in the GAP universe. This is because the market has moved towards low-cost discount retailers. As a result, brands like Old Navy are prospering. On the other hand, more expensive brands like the Banana Republic and GAP are seeing their sales decline.

Hence, GAP’s overall sales and profits are seeing a negative trend. On the other hand, Old Navy’s sales and profits have been seeing a positive trend. Up until now, Old Navy was just making up for all the losses that GAP is making. However, in the future, this is likely to change. Since Old Navy has now split up into a separate brand, all the excess cash flow and profits that it generates will be plowed back to fund its own growth.

It needs to be understood that Old Navy has been a remarkable growth story until now. The brand was initially created as a cheaper version of GAP during the 1990s. Ever since then, the brand has been growing each year aggressively. The brand now generates a massive $8 billion in sales worldwide! Investors are likely to queue up to invest their money in Old Navy since they believe that it is a winning business model.

How the Breakup will Help?

Firstly, the GAP- Old Navy breakup will help the company prioritize its resources. For instance, since Old Navy is a discount brand, it’s in store sales are greater than its online sales. This is the reason why Old Navy is the only brand within the GAP umbrella, which plans to increase its store base. GAP, Banana Republic and all the other brands actually plane to reduce their store base drastically. This is because the majority of their sales are taking place online.

The strategy needs of the Old Navy brand are very different from the rest of the company. This brand needs to follow the strategy of aggressive growth. In order to achieve this growth, it needs more capital. However, the cost of capital is very high, given that laggards like GAP are also part of the same brand portfolio. By spinning off Old Navy into a separate brand, GAP has made it possible for them to achieve more funding at a better cost.

On the other hand, the strategy of other brands like GAP and the Banana Republic is likely to be more defensive. They are more likely to cut down costs and eliminate overheads to deliver bottom-line growth to investors even if the top line doesn’t change much. Rationalizing costs is the need of the hour for all other brands in the GAP portfolio except Old Navy.

Issues with the GAP-Old Navy Breakup

The GAP-Old Navy breakup is likely to post many issues as well. Firstly, up until now, both these brands have been jointly rewarding loyalty. Now, since these brands will split up into different companies, it will be difficult to divide the loyalty points so that the consumers can redeem them.

Also, both the companies had significant economies of scale when it came to making purchases. It will be interesting to see whether the suppliers renegotiate their purchase agreements with the company. If they do not, maybe both these companies can stick together as sister concerns while making purchases. This is because all GAP brands are trying to reduce their costs. A cost overrun is one of the last things they need, given the fact that the very survival of the brand is in question.

The reality is that even though GAP is a legendary brand, it will still face several issues in the future. If the company is not able to get its act together and reinvent itself, it could be the beginning of the end for GAP Inc. It will be interesting to see how the future plays out for this company.

Article Written by

Admin

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Why are Corporations Hoarding Trillions in Cash?

Admin

Why College Education Should Not Be Free?

Admin

Why Do Mutual Funds Lend To Promoters?

Admin